
After a week of questions surrounding the direction of Louisiana football, Michael Desormeaux and his team delivered their most convincing response of the season. Now comes the harder part: proving it wasn’t just one Saturday.
A week ago, I wrote an article asking whether Louisiana’s matchup against Troy was bigger than just another conference football game.
On the surface, it was a fairly simple question. The Cajuns were coming off a frustrating, heartbreaking loss to Louisiana Tech, a game they had every opportunity to win. Another defeat would have dropped Louisiana to 1-2 in Sun Belt play and brought some uncomfortable conversations about the direction of the program under Michael Desormeaux.
But beneath the surface, the question was much bigger.
What exactly is the identity of Louisiana football right now? Is this a program capable of consistently competing for Sun Belt championships, or one that has settled into a frustrating cycle of inconsistency?
And perhaps most importantly, can Michael Desormeaux get this program back to the standard that Louisiana fans became accustomed to not all that long ago?
Well, on Saturday afternoon, the Cajuns offered a response.
And it was a pretty convincing one.
Not a last-second field goal. Not a fortunate bounce. Not another afternoon spent nervously watching the clock while hoping the Cajuns could somehow survive.
This was a good, old-fashioned whipping of a conference opponent.
The Cajuns improved to 5-2 overall and 2-1 in Sun Belt play, and for the first time in a while, they looked like a team that knew exactly what it wanted to do, how it wanted to do it, and had the confidence to execute it.
For a coaching staff that had plenty of questions to answer entering the weekend, that was significant.
What impressed me most about Saturday wasn’t necessarily the final score. It was the manner in which Louisiana controlled the football game.
The Cajuns rushed for 243 yards, converted 10 of 17 third downs, held possession for more than 36 minutes, and limited Troy to just 267 yards of offense.
Those aren’t flashy statistics that are going to dominate national headlines, but they represent something Louisiana fans have been begging to see.
Physical football. Disciplined football. Complementary football.The kind of football that helped build the success this program enjoyed before the coaching transition.
Four Cajuns rushed for at least 50 yards, with Lunch Winfield leading the way with 65. JJ Garner added 62, Anthony Reagan Jr. contributed 58, and Steven Blanco finished with 50.
Nobody had to be Superman.
The offensive line created opportunities, the running backs took advantage, and Winfield managed the game without turning the football over. Was the passing attack explosive? Not particularly. Winfield completed 11 of 21 passes for just 70 yards and a touchdown.
That part of the offense still needs work, especially against opponents that can force Louisiana to throw the football.
But Saturday proved something else: when Louisiana can establish the run, sustain drives and avoid putting itself in difficult situations, this offense can be effective.
And perhaps even more encouraging was the fact that the Cajuns didn’t need a perfect offensive performance to dominate a conference opponent.
Coming into the weekend, Troy had established itself as one of the better rushing teams in the Sun Belt.
The Trojans had been averaging more than 220 rushing yards per game, and quarterback Goose Crowder was coming off an impressive performance against Southern Miss.
Louisiana’s defense made sure that momentum didn’t carry into Lafayette.
Troy managed just 126 rushing yards, converted only three of its 12 third-down opportunities, and failed on three of four fourth-down attempts.
The Trojans reached the end zone just once.
And when Troy finally showed some life with a touchdown on its opening possession of the second half, Louisiana’s offense delivered what might have been the most important drive of the afternoon.
Starting at its own 9-yard line, the Cajuns marched 91 yards in 16 plays, eating up more than eight minutes before Blanco punched it in from two yards out.
That drive was more than just seven points.
It was a statement.
Troy had finally generated a little momentum, and rather than allowing the game to become uncomfortable, Louisiana took the football and essentially told the Trojans they weren’t getting it back anytime soon.
That’s what good football teams do.
And frankly, that’s the type of response that has been missing in some of Louisiana’s more frustrating performances over the past few seasons.
Here’s where I think we need to be fair.
Last week’s article wasn’t written because I wanted Michael Desormeaux to fail. Quite the opposite.
It was written because I believe Louisiana football should be held to a higher standard, and because the success this program experienced before Desormeaux took over shouldn’t simply become a distant memory.
We watched Billy Napier elevate expectations. We watched Louisiana become a program that expected to compete for championships rather than simply hope to qualify for a bowl game.
That doesn’t mean Desormeaux has to duplicate every accomplishment of his predecessor. But it does mean those expectations shouldn’t disappear just because there’s a different name on the office door.
And if we’re going to question the coaching staff when things don’t go well, we should be equally willing to recognize when they get things right.
Saturday, they got a lot right.
The Cajuns were prepared. They were physical. They played with purpose. And perhaps most importantly, they responded to adversity instead of allowing it to define them.
This wasn’t a game Louisiana stole.
It was a game Louisiana controlled.
Credit Desormeaux, his assistants and the players for delivering exactly the kind of response this program needed following the disappointment in Ruston.
Now comes the part where we have to keep things in perspective.
As impressive as the victory over Troy was, it doesn’t automatically erase the frustration of previous seasons or the opportunities this program has allowed to slip away.
Remember, this is the same Louisiana team that surrendered a 12-point fourth-quarter lead against Louisiana Tech just one week earlier, ultimately falling 32-31.
That’s part of what has made evaluating Desormeaux’s tenure so frustrating.
We have seen flashes of really good football. We’ve seen this team compete against quality opponents. We’ve seen stretches where everything seems to be clicking.
But we’ve also seen head-scratching performances, missed opportunities and games where Louisiana simply hasn’t looked prepared to finish the job.
That’s where the larger questions remain.
Can this team string together complete performances? Can it consistently beat the teams it’s supposed to beat? Can it avoid the kind of unexpected setbacks that have prevented previous seasons from reaching their full potential?
And can Desormeaux turn one impressive Saturday into something more sustainable?
Because that’s ultimately how a head coach should be judged.
Not by the best game of the season. Not by the worst game of the season.
But by the overall trajectory of the program.
Louisiana is now 5-2, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that record. In fact, plenty of programs would gladly trade places with the Cajuns.
But context matters.
We aren’t evaluating Louisiana football in a vacuum. We’re evaluating it against the expectations that were established when this program was winning conference championships, competing for national recognition and making Louisiana football relevant well beyond the borders of Acadiana.
Those expectations didn’t leave when Napier did.
And they shouldn’t.
If Troy was an opportunity to answer the criticism, Southern Miss becomes an opportunity to validate the response.
The Cajuns travel to Hattiesburg on October 24 for another important Sun Belt West matchup.
And while beating Troy by 27 points was impressive, following that performance with another strong showing on the road would tell us considerably more about the direction of this team.
This is where good teams begin separating themselves.
It’s one thing to respond emotionally after a disappointing loss. It’s another to maintain that same focus, preparation and physicality the following week.
Louisiana can’t afford to treat Saturday’s victory as some sort of season-defining accomplishment.
The Cajuns have five regular-season games remaining, and they’re still very much in the conversation in the Sun Belt West.
There’s a chance to build something meaningful here.
But that opportunity comes with responsibility.
The players have to continue executing. The coaches have to continue putting them in positions to succeed. And the entire program has to demonstrate that the consistency displayed against Troy can become the expectation rather than the exception.
Not completely.
And I don’t think anyone should expect him to after one game.
But he certainly earned some breathing room.
Saturday was the type of performance that reminds fans why Desormeaux was entrusted with this program in the first place.
It showed a team that was capable of imposing its will physically, playing sound defense, protecting the football and controlling a conference opponent from start to finish.
Those are encouraging signs.
And after the way the Louisiana Tech game ended, they were badly needed.
I’ve said before that I believe Desormeaux genuinely cares about this university, this program and the people who support it. His connection to Louisiana isn’t something I question.
But caring about the program and consistently delivering the results expected of it are two different things.
That’s not a personal criticism. That’s simply the reality of being a head football coach.
And the standard should apply equally when things are going well and when they’re not.
Saturday was a reminder that this team has the ability to play at a high level. It was also a reminder that the pieces are there for Louisiana to make some noise in the Sun Belt.
The question now is whether this performance becomes a turning point or simply another example of what the Cajuns are capable of when everything comes together.
There’s a big difference.
Last week, I questioned whether the Troy game meant more than what appeared on the surface.
After watching Saturday’s performance, I believe it absolutely did.
Not because Michael Desormeaux’s job was necessarily hanging in the balance. Not because one conference game was going to determine the future of Louisiana football.
But because this program needed to show that it could respond to disappointment with something other than excuses, frustration or another missed opportunity.
And that’s exactly what it did.
For the players, it was a well-earned victory. For the coaching staff, it was a much-needed validation of their preparation. And for Louisiana fans, it was an afternoon that offered a little reassurance about what this team might still accomplish.
But I’m not ready to declare that everything has been fixed.
I am, however, willing to acknowledge that Saturday was a significant step in the right direction.
Coach Des and his team deserved the criticism that came with the Louisiana Tech loss. They also deserve the praise that comes with dismantling Troy.
Both things can be true.
And maybe that’s the most important takeaway from all of this.
We don’t have to choose between blindly supporting a coach and demanding better results.
We can do both.
Because ultimately, this isn’t about being right or wrong about Michael Desormeaux.It’s about wanting Louisiana football to be successful.
Saturday reminded us what that success can look like.
Now it’s time to see it again.
Because the standard isn’t beating Troy once. The standard is building a program where performances like Saturday’s are expected.
C’est Tout.
Get breaking news and curated stories delivered to your inbox every day. Be the first to know what’s happening around Louisiana athletics!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere. uis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Delete